

- Omnifocus web interface for mac#
- Omnifocus web interface update#
- Omnifocus web interface software#
- Omnifocus web interface code#
It’s a relic of the age of Panic and OmniGroup: companies that would build beautiful user interfaces for Mac users who would gladly pay significantly more than 99 cents for their perpetual licenses.
Omnifocus web interface software#
Things is one of those pieces of software that has been painstakingly improved over years and years of hard work by brilliant people. If you like having a score, use Todoist.

I have used all of them: here is what I have learned. Maybe it's time to reevaluate our relationship with electronic music's favorite medium.Todo lists are boring. WITI contributor Rex Sorgatz on creating all 68,719,476,736 possible melodies ( NRB ) Valentine’s Day Gifts for Flu Season ( NRB )
Omnifocus web interface update#
Also, some of you update your bios a lot. One of my very favorite emails every day isn’t a brilliantly written newsletter, but rather Spoonbill, a digest of bio updates for everyone I follow on Twitter. Or, as Vonnegut put it in Hocus Pocus, “Another flaw in the human character is that everybody wants to build and nobody wants to do maintenance.” ( NRB ) In other words, by making maintenance a feature instead of a byproduct you cross your fingers and hope for, you can actually create more efficient and resilient systems. And, in the end, even though it seems like an approach like this should create more work (just as the weekly review in Omnifocus first appears), it actually cuts down unneeded or ineffective work for a relatively small price. As one type of wheat thrives or another withers, adjustments can be made. Planting a diversity like this makes the field much more resilient to total failure. The same starting wheat population will look different and produce differently in each field in which it is planted, and each field will look different and produce differently each year. The specifics of the soil in which it is grown and the weather during that growing season will determine which of the wheats in the population will do better and which will do less well. It is highly sensitive to the growing environment: soil and weather. … A diverse wheat population embodies some qualities of maintenance by design.

This latter monoculture approach is how nearly all modern wheat is grown. One of the more exciting innovations here is an old approach to wheat cultivation in which a field is sown with a genetically diverse population of wheats instead of just one variety of genetically undiverse wheat. Over the last two years I’ve spent a surprising amount of time trying to understand agriculture in general and wheat in particular.
Omnifocus web interface code#
While this seems obvious in its relation to code and projects, the piece uses the story of wheat fields to illustrate the power of building with maintenance in mind : This allows many small fixes (easier and usually cheaper) instead of a big one (harder, requiring more downtime, more expensive).” in order to catch them when they are still small. “The most common way to think about maintenance,” the piece explains, “is as a process of finding and fixing broken stuff- maintenance as the routinized search for problems. As I was reading this excellent post about “ maintenance by design ” by Vaughn Tan (shared by WITI contributor Nick Parish ), it struck me that this review feature is part of a much bigger story of designing systems to be maintained. The concept of checking in on something in regular intervals with the purpose of pruning seems like a much better approach than letting something get so disorganized you eventually declare bankruptcy. Like I said, I’ve been taken by this idea and curious why it doesn’t exist in other products. (If you want to give this a try, here’s a much better list of questions to ask. I find it to be a cathartic exercise and look forward to my review every Thursday at 4 pm (it’s in the calendar). Mostly what I do is check whether a) it’s still something I’m working on/interested in and b) there any tasks that I can check off/get rid of. Whether it’s once a week or every two months, you can then go through all your projects that are up for review and check in on them. Each project in Omnifocus has an option to set a review cadence. But there’s one part of Omnifocus that’s different than any other tool I’ve ever used and has intrigued me since I encountered it: the Weekly Review. If all of this sounds pretty generic, that’s because it is. There’s also an inbox (plus handy keyboard shortcut) for sending all your random ideas and todos as soon as you think of them. Most of it works exactly the way every other task/project management tool works: You’ve got projects, those projects have tasks, and those tasks have due dates. One of the thousands of personal productivity tools, it’s notable for its age (12 years old) and terrible web interface (thankfully the iOS and Mac apps are fast and easy).

About six months ago I decided to give the task management tool Omnifocus a shot.
